Aspiring lawyers fume after being forced to URINATE in buckets

Aspiring lawyers fume after ‘being forced to urinate in buckets while invigilators watched on camera’ while sitting their bar exams remotely

  • Bar students ‘told they could fail two-hour and 45 minute exam if they left seats’ 
  • Those in exam ‘forced to urinate in bottles and buckets while being monitored’ 
  • Students were watched by a remote invigilator through their webcams in exam

Aspiring lawyers have claimed they were forced to urinate in bottles and buckets while invigilators watched from their laptop cameras during online bar exams.

The bar students said they were told they could fail their two-hour and 45 minute paper if they left their seats or did not maintain eye contact with their computer screen.

As a result, some students had to urinate into receptacles while being monitored by a remote invigilator through their webcams.

The professional ethics exam, which was set by the Bar Standards Board (BSB), is one of three centralised tests they must sit as part of the Bar Professional Training Course.

Bar student Tian Juin See said he had to urinate into a bottle while maintaining eye contact with his laptop screen so he would not be accused of cheating during the exam on Tuesday

Bar student Tian Juin See said he had to urinate into a bottle while maintaining eye contact with his laptop screen so he would not be accused of cheating.

The 23-year-old, who was taking the online exam at his home near Farringdon, London, claimed he ‘pleaded’ with his invigilator to let him use the bathroom.

He said: ‘I informed him I was going to use the bottle, he still said policy did not allow him to let me use the toilet.

‘So I was forced to empty the contents of my water bottle on my carpet to make space for the urine.

‘And he said I can’t look away from the camera or turn away otherwise he would be forced to end the exam.’

The BSB said students who opted to take the exams at home were provided with ‘straightforward guidance’ making it clear they would not be allowed to leave their rooms to protect the integrity of the test.

Its guide instead urged students to ‘prepare yourself for not being able to leave the room for the duration of your exam, for example by going to the toilet as close to the start of the exam as possible’, a BSB spokesman said.

Students who opted to take the exam in a test centre had access to a toilet.

The bar students said they were told they could fail their two-hour and 45 minute paper if they left their seats or did not maintain eye contact with their computer screen (stock image)

Aspiring barrister Sophie Lamb, 28, who studies at the BPP University Law School in Leeds, said she was forced to urinate in a bucket while sat in front of her laptop in her kitchen during the test.

Miss Lamb, who lives near Hull, in East Yorkshire, said: ‘To be honest it was a bit ridiculous. The fact that this is an organisation that is meant to be promoting our ethical standards, but also our welfare.’

She said: ‘I had to put the bucket under the chair and I was wearing a long dress and had to squat down, but make sure my face was still on camera.’

The BSB said some 5,211 centralised examinations were due to take place this month.

Bar student Pete Kennedy, 30, of Silvertown, in east London, added: ‘It’s pretty outrageous to force students into this dilemma.

‘This is the culmination of years of study and we are forced to terminate our exams to use the bathroom or wee in a bucket.

‘All because we apparently cannot be trusted by our regulator, in an ethics exam of all things, not to cheat.’

He said students had raised the toilet break issue with the BSB, but had been told the only alternative was to attend an exam centre which he did not wish to do during the coronavirus pandemic.

Source: Read Full Article